ÿWPCN C^ñÔi… Ó2ÍožÍŠ™#Mzf £R§ […öTˆ°=*êG˜Oí¸øÂ/æBîì CkîÕCûHß($s!÷òbJ@Õ¨ÎZs‰æÒ' \ö5þŠálØ*Š%üTãÜýJ¿)îÃÞG]±dL/WµE¢Zm\K!Ã7³cNòÑü™f‡™ÿ_˜JŒ–à¿~Dj”ò8„ˆü²Ó–ø´.³ËX‹ku hn>.œ†»\¥®D¾éÑà‘rý¸¢”âÛü¥­EeÙû=ª¤™+¼ôª ››Û-£(0}àTÜ}´Vç,ûp‘ì6ÇFÖ’]òïŠWÁ£’X ­”ï4‘ôª ÙÂÉÈåAz»¢G¡Ì“lª–{ÝÉ•4H@3'ì·59@¿ÉU¼ž-‘‡hï•du¤áªµ$ê‹`W;"ÿu×|Áûá• ÉÓG'®.s; LÔ‡aGö¸a~Æn—£c¹ ™È’›,¦{^PW0ËÂ0àýL´\(sŒ^Ù'¢…ë%ßoÅ£l±|«rógü¨§â;9Cdš<’êKZ4L4‰‡ è>Yëìp»Â•+ÕÝ]—EêâšåôŽ¢±eXÿ{NG’óU+ç¨vcÅqêÄ|õ&ku#ÁfUN' %u 0:{ ^ µ wÁ 4Å Ù è mê  U: U ,C Eo q ~‡ N B B*$˜HP LaserJet 4,ü,,,,,ü0(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman RegularX(üœ$¡¡ÔUSUS.,Ô.Ž*+s eH+` 3|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ ,–ûyAZ‹"Arial Regular,c½¬AZ‹Arial  Ñ e Ñ Ñ  ' Matos0Matos .    d&ÿÿ0 d dÝ ƒüœ!ÝÔUSUS.,ÔÝ  ÝÔ_Ôò òòòÓÓÔ‡ X!XXXÔóóó óÓ  ÓÑ€ïOÑà @ àà @` àà @¸ àà @ àà @h àà @À àÔ#†XôøXX X!U#ÔÔ‡ X!XXXôøÔIN€THE€UNITED€STATES€DISTRICT€COURTÐ ° Ðà@@Î Î 5ìàFOR€THE€DISTRICT€OF€PUERTO€RICOÐ |Ì ÐßA€t)öÉìdEöÉìAßÓ  ÓUNITED€STATES€OF€AMERICAà0 h àà À àà  àÐH˜h(#h(# Ѐ€Plaintiffà0 ` àà0¸ ` (#` (#àà0¸ (#¸ (#àà h àà À àÐ d(#(# Ðà0  àà0` (#(#à€vs.à0¸ ` (#` (#àà@ìì*ì¸ (#¸ (#àˆà0  àCriminal€No.€00„000Ô#†XôøXX X!#ÔÔ‡ X!XXXôøÔÐà 0(#(# ÐDEFENDANTà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€à È à€€€€€€€€€Ð ¬ ü  Ѐ€Defendantà0 ` àà0¸ ` (#` (#àà0¸ (#¸ (#àÔ#†XôøXX X!R#ÔÔ‡ X!XXXôøÔÐxÈ (#(# Ðà0  àà0` (#(#àà0¸ ` (#` (#àà  àà h àÐ ¸ (#¸ (# ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àà @¸ àà @ àà @h àßA€`)¬›l dE¬›l Aßò òMOTION€REQUESTING€A€BILL€OF€PARTICULARSó óÐ ` ÐÓÓÓ33ÓHON.€€DANIEL€R.€Ô_ÔDOMINGUEZÔ_ÔÐ è8 ÐDISTRICT€JUDGEÐ ûK ÐUNITED€STATES€DISTRICT€COURTÐ ^ ÐFOR€THE€DISTRICT€OF€PUERTO€RICOÔ#†XôøXX X!s#ÔÔ‡ X!XXXôøÔÐ !q ÐÓ33ïÓÌà  àCOMES€NOW,€the€defendant€and€moves€this€Court€for€an€Order€granting€him€aÐ P ÐBill€of€Particulars€specifying€particularly€the€conduct(s),€time(s)€and€parties€involved€inÐ Ì Ðthe€agreement€that€the€Indictment€alleges€against€him.Ð ˜è Ðà  àThis€motion€is€based€on€the€Memorandum€of€Law,€attached€hereto,€and€herebyÐ d ´ Ðincorporated€by€reference.Ð 0"€  ÐÓfæÓà  àÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àòòÔ#†XôøXà X!å#ÔÔ‡ X!XàXôøÔJoseph€C.€Laws,€Jr.óóÐ Ê$ # Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àFederal€Public€DefenderÐ ˜%è $ ÐÓfæïÓÌÓfæÓà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àòòÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àóóÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àAssistant€Federal€Public€DefenderÐ Î)%) Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àÔ_ÔUSDPRÔ_Ô„€Ð œ*ì%* Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à259€F.D.€RooseveltÐ j+º&+ Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àSan€Juan,€PR€€00918„2305Ð 8,ˆ', Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àTel.€€281„4922Ô#†XôøXX X!ˆ #ÔÔ‡ X!XXXôøÔÐ -V(- ÐÓfæi Óà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àÐ Ô-$). ÐÑïOÑâ âÑe°Ñâ âÑ  ÑÔ_ÔÓ  Óò òMEMORANDUM€OF€LAWÐ e ÐÓ  ÓÓ  ÓTABLE€OF€AUTHORITIESó óÐ =Ø ÐÓÓ1.€The€Fifth,€Sixth€and€Fourteenth€AmendmentsÔ#†XôøXX X!Æ #ÔÔ‡ X!XXXôøÔ€to€the€Constitution€of€the€United€States;Ð ° Ð2.€€òòRussell€v.€United€Statesóó,€369€U.S.€at€749,€82€Ô_ÔS.CtÔ_Ô.€at€1047(1989);€Ð á | Ð3.€òòBerger€v.€United€Statesóó,€295€U.S.€at€78,€55€Ô_ÔS.CtÔ_Ô.€629€(1935);Ð ­ H Ð4.€€òòUnited€States€v.€Ô_ÔMarroquinÔ_Ô,óó€136€F.3d€220€(1998);Ð y   Ð5.€Ô#†XôøXX X!³#ÔÔ‡ X!XXXôøÔ€òòUnited€States€v.€Ô_ÔHallockÔ_Ôóó,€941€F.2d€36,€40€(1st€Cir.1991);€Ð Eà  Ð6.€òòUnited€States€v.€Leachóó,€427€F.2d€1107,€1110€(1st€Cir.),€cert.€denied,€400€U.S.€829,Ð ¬  Ð91€Ô_ÔS.CtÔ_Ô.€95,€27€Ô_ÔL.EdÔ_Ô.2d€59€(1970);Ô#†XôøXX X!£#ÔÔ‡ X!XXXôøÔÐ Ýx Ð7.€òòUnited€States€v.€Ô_ÔTomasettaÔ_Ô,€óó429€F.2d€978€(1st€Cir.1970).Ô#†XôøXX X!.#ÔÔ‡ X!XXXôøÔÐ ©D ÐÌò òÓ  ÓISSUE€PRESENTEDó óÐ AÜ ÐÓÓà  àIs€a€Bill€of€Particulars€necessary€in€the€instant€prosecution€in€order€for€theÐ ´ Ðdefendant€to€properly€prepare€his€defense€and€to€adequately€secure€the€rightsÐ å€ Ðguaranteed€to€him€by€the€United€States€Constitution€and€applicable€case€law?€Ð ±L Ðà  àIn€particular,€is€the€Bill€of€Particulars€requested€in€this€case,€necessary€to€assureÐ } Ðthe€Defendant€of€the€following€constitutional€rights:Ð I!ä  Ð1.€€The€due€process€requirements€of€the€Fifth€and€Fourteenth€Amendment€to€the€UnitedÐ #°" ÐStates€Constitution;€Ð á$| $ Ð2.€The€Sixth€Amendment€rights€of€the€United€States€ConstitutionÔ#†XôøXX X!æ#ÔÔ‡ X!XXXôøÔ€insuring€effectiveÐ ­&H"& Ðassistance€of€counsel,€notice€and€compulsory€process,€and;Ð y($( Ð3.€€His€Fifth€Amendment€rights€against€self€incrimination€and€against€double€jeopardy?Ð E*à%* ÐÌÓ  Óò òÐ Ý-x). ÐSTATEMENT€OF€à @¸ àFACTSó óÐ e ÐÓ  Óà  àThe€Indictment€filed€against€Mr.€Defendant€in€this€case€alleges,€in€part,€asÐ =Ø Ðfollows:Ð  ¤ Ðà  àð ðFrom€or€about€the€beginning€of€August€1998,€and€continuing€until€on€or€aboutÐ Õ p ÐAugust€4,€1998,€in€the€District€of€Puerto€Rico€and€within€the€jurisdiction€of€this€Court,Ð ¡ < Ð[lists€the€defendants]€.€.€.€€€€€€€€€€,€the€defendants€herein,€did,€knowingly€and€intentionally,Ð m   Ðcombine,€conspire,€and€òòagree€with€each€other€and€with€divers€other€persons€to€theÐ 9Ô  Ðgrand€jury€known€and€unknownóó,€to€commit€an€offense€against€the€United€States,€that€isÐ    Ðto€knowingly€and€intentionally€possess€with€intent€to€distribute€a€controlled€substance,€toÐ Ñl Ðwit:€more€than€five€(5)€kilograms€of€cocaine,€a€Schedule€II€Narcotic€Drug€ControlledÐ 8 ÐSubstance,€in€violation€of€Title€21,€United€States€Code,€Section€841(a)(1).ðð€(EmphasisÐ i Ðadded).Ð 5Ð Ðà  àThe€Indictment€then€goes€on€to€list€the€object€of€the€conspiracy,€the€manner€andÐ œ Ðmeans€used€to€accomplish€the€conspiracy,€the€overt€acts€in€furtherance€of€theÐ Íh Ðconspiracy€and€the€allegations€of€the€interactions€of€the€defendants€and€others€for€aÐ ™4 Ðtotal€of€four€counts.€Defendant€is€mentioned€no€place€else€in€this€Indictment.Ð e Ðà  àA€copy€of€the€Indictment€is€attached€for€the€Courtððs€convenience.Ð 1!Ì  Ðà  àDefendant€has€received€discovery€materials€from€the€prosecution.€It€consists€ofÐ ý"˜" Ðthree€photographs€whose€captions€or€content€do€not€reflect€the€defendant,€andÐ É$d $ Ðapproximately€one€inch€of€photocopies€of€the€front€of€checks.€The€defendant€is€not€theÐ •&0"& Ðpayee€or€is€otherwise€mentioned€in€any€of€the€checks.Ð a(ü#( ÐÌÓ  Óò òÌÐ Ñ-l). ÐARGUMENTó óÐ e ÐÓ  Óà  àAn€indictment€is€required€to€begin€a€prosecution,€unless€waived,€as€stated€in€FifthÐ =Ø ÐAmendment€of€the€Constitution€of€the€United€States.€The€indictment€has€not€beenÐ  ¤ Ðwaived€in€this€case.Ð Õ p Ðà  àThe€Supreme€Court€has€noted,€that€the€purpose€of€an€indictment€is€to€inform€theÐ ¡ < Ðaccused€of€the€charges€so€that€he€may€prepare€a€defense,€and€"in€case€any€otherÐ m   Ðproceedings€are€taken€against€him€for€a€similar€offense,"€to€show€accurately€the€extentÐ 9Ô  Ðof€his€acquittal€or€conviction.€òòRussell€v.€United€Statesóó,€369€U.S.€at€749,€82€Ô_ÔS.CtÔ_Ô.€atÐ    Ð1047(1989);€òòBerger€v.€United€Statesóó,€295€U.S.€at€78,€55€Ô_ÔS.CtÔ_Ô.€629€(1935).Ð Ñl Ðà  àThis€Indictment€does€not€give€sufficient€notice€to€the€Defendant€of€what€he€isÐ 8 Ðalleged€to€have€done;€he€is€therefore€unable€to€prepare€an€adequate€defense,€preventÐ i Ðsurprises€at€trial€by€the€prosecution€or€to€avail€himself€of€double€jeopardy€protection.Ð 5Ð Ðà  àThe€Constitution€of€the€United€States€requires€that€an€accused€be€informed€ofÐ œ Ðthe€ð ðnature€and€cause€of€the€accusation,ðð€please€see,€the€Sixth€Amendment€to€theÐ Íh ÐConstitution.€In€the€case€against€defendant€the€Indictment€gives€him€notice€of€the€causeÐ ™4 Ðagainst€him,€an€agreement€involving€the€sale€of€drugs,€but€not€the€nature€of€the€actsÐ e Ðthat€he€is€alleged€to€have€performed€in€order€to€perpetuate€the€crime€alleged€againstÐ 1!Ì  Ðhim,€the€dates€that€he€is€alleged€to€have€performed€them€and€with€whom.€It€containsÐ ý"˜" Ðonly€a€general€averment€as€to€agreement,€as€previously€stated.Ð É$d $ Ðà  à€A€Bill€of€Particulars€is€therefore€necessary€to€provide€adequate€notice.Ð •&0"& ÐOtherwise,€the€Constitution€of€the€United€States€is€violated€in€the€following€respects:Ð a(ü#( Ðà  à1.€€Due€process,€as€required€by€the€Fifth€and€Fourteenth€Amendment€to€theÐ -*È%* ÐUnited€States€Constitution€is€not€observed;Ð ù+”', Ðà  à2.€The€effective€assistance€of€counsel,€notice€to€the€defendant€and€compulsoryÐ Å-`). Ðprocess€are€not€protected€as€required€by€the€Sixth€Amendment€of€the€United€StatesÐ e ÐConstitution;€Ð 1Ì Ðà  à3.€He€is€not€afforded€his€Fifth€Amendment€rights€to€remain€silent€or€to€theÐ ý˜ Ðprotection€of€the€double€jeopardy€clause€of€the€same€document.Ð É d Ðà  àA€Bill€of€Particulars€is€a€proper€pre€trial€request€to€the€Court.€òòUnited€States€v.Ð • 0 ÐÔ_ÔMarroquinÔ_Ô,óó€136€F.3d€220€(1998).€Ô#†XôøXX X!I#ÔÔ‡ X!XXXôøÔð ðBills€of€particulars€are€designed€to€provide€sufficientÐ a ü  Ðadditional€detail€to€enable€an€accused€to€mount€an€adequate€defense,€avoid€doubleÐ -È  Ðjeopardy,€and€prevent€surprise€at€trial.ðð€òòUnited€States€v.€Ô_ÔHallockÔ_Ôóó,€941€F.2d€36,€40€(1stÐ ù”  ÐCir.1991);€òòUnited€States€v.€Leachóó,€427€F.2d€1107,€1110€(1st€Cir.),€cert.€denied,€400Ð Å` ÐU.S.€829,€91€Ô_ÔS.CtÔ_Ô.€95,€27€Ô_ÔL.EdÔ_Ô.2d€59€(1970).€If€the€indictment€is€vague€and€a€Bill€ofÐ ‘, ÐParticulars€is€not€provided€the€defendant€will€no€be€able€to€prepare€his€defense.Ð ]ø Ðà  àIn€this€case€the€only€allegation,€contained€in€the€indictment€against€Mr.Ð )Ä ÐDefendant,€is€that€he€agreed€with€the€other€defendants€and€with€ð ð€.€.€.€divers€otherÐ õ Ðpersons€to€the€Grand€jury€known€and€unknown€.€.€.€ðð€€to€possess€and€distribute€cocaine.Ð Á\ ÐIf€the€only€thing€being€alleged€against€the€defendant€is€an€agreement€then€it€certainlyÐ ( Ðcannot€be€much€of€a€burden€for€the€government€to€state€when€the€agreement€tookÐ Yô Ðplace,€where€it€took€place,€and€between€whom.€Ð %!À  Ðà  àThe€discovery€provided€to€the€defense€in€this€case€does€nothing€to€alleviate€theÐ ñ"Œ" Ðproblem.€It€consists,€as€previously€stated,€of€photographs€and€copies€of€checks€that€doÐ ½$X $ Ðnot,€by€their€content,€involve€the€defendant€in€any€way.Ð ‰&$"& Ðà  àIf€more€particularity€is€not€provided,€a€number€of€defenses€that€may€otherwise€beÐ U(ð#( Ðpresent,€may€be€unavailable€to€the€defense.€For€example,€if€this€Court€granted€theÐ !*¼%* Ðdefendantððs€request,€the€defendant€may€be€able€to€show€that€on€that€date€theÐ í+ˆ', Ðagreement€is€alleged€to€have€taken€place,€he€was€elsewhere€or€the€persons€he€isÐ ¹-T). Ðalleged€to€have€been€with€were€elsewhere.€By€not€providing€that€information,€the€entireÐ e Ðline€of€defense€is€precluded€to€the€defendant.€He€cannot,€prior€to€trial,€prepare€an€alibiÐ 1Ì Ðdefense€because€there€is€no€information€of€where,€when€and€with€whom€he€is€alleged€toÐ ý˜ Ðhave€conspired.Ð É d Ѐ€€€€€€€€€€€€Furthermore,€he€cannot€compel€the€appearance€of€necessary€witnesses€inÐ • 0 Ðcourt,€because,€of€course,€he€does€not€have€the€requisite€information€that€would€enableÐ a ü  Ðhim€to€determine€what€witnesses€he€will€need.€In€other€words,€the€pre€trial€preparationÐ -È  Ðof€the€case€is€severely€compromised.€Ð ù”  Ðà  àThe€defendantððs€right€to€be€represented€by€counsel€is€curtailed;€counsel€simplyÐ Å` Ðcannot€do€adequate€pretrial€preparation.€In€short,€the€attorneyððs€constitutional€functionÐ ‘, Ðof€providing€an€adequate€defense€for€the€client€is€compromised.Ð ]ø Ðà  àAgain,€the€defendantððs€right€against€self€incrimination€may€be€compromised.€IfÐ )Ä Ðthe€information€relative€to€the€charge€is€not€specific€he€cannot€know€when€he€can€assertÐ õ Ðhis€right€against€self€incrimination€and€when€that€right€will€not€lie.Ð Á\ Ðà  àThe€requested€information€is€also€necessary€to€complete€the€investigation€of€theÐ ( Ðcase.€Otherwise,€investigating€the€case€for€the€defense€becomes€a€practicalÐ Yô Ðimpossibility.€Instead€of€concentrating€on€the€people€that€the€government€claims€wereÐ %!À  Ðinvolved€with€the€defendant€on€the€days€and/or€times€that€are€pertinent,€all€persons,€allÐ ñ"Œ" Ðdays€and€all€times€must€be€investigated,€i.e.,€the€defendant€must€investigate€€.€.€.€ððdiversÐ ½$X $ Ðother€persons€.€.€.€€known€and€unknown€.€.€.€ðð€How€can€that€be€done€in€a€reasonableÐ ‰&$"& Ðmanner?€There€are€not€adequate€resources€nor€is€there€adequate€time€to€do€it.Ð U(ð#( Ðà  àDefendant€argues€that€the€Indictment€in€this€case€is€similar€to€that€found€inÐ !*¼%* ÐòòUnited€States€v.€Ô_ÔTomasettaÔ_Ô,€óó429€F.2d€978€(1st€Cir.1970).€In€that€case€the€First€CircuitÐ í+ˆ', Ðfound€the€indictment€impermissibly€vague€because€it€failed€to€specify€the€name€of€theÐ ¹-T). Ðvictim,€the€means€of€the€alleged€extortion,€or€the€precise€location.€The€Court€noted€that€Ð e Ð.€.€.€ððwhile€no€single€factor€was€determinative,€the€three€omissions,€taken€together,Ð 1Ì Ðmade€it€difficult€for€the€defendant€to€determine€exactly€what€conduct€of€his€had€givenÐ ý˜ Ðrise€to€a€charge€of€extortion.ðð€Ð É d Ðà  àThe€òòÔ_ÔTomasettaÔ_ÔÔ#†XôøXX X!),#ÔÔ‡ X!XXXôøÔ€óócase€is€similar€to€the€instant€case.€Without€a€bill€of€particulars€theÐ • 0 Ðdefendant€will€have€no€way€of€knowing,€through€the€averments€in€the€Indictment,€whichÐ a ü  Ðof€potentially€several€contacts€that€he€had€on€the€dates€in€question€are€alleged€by€theÐ -È  Ðgovernment€to€give€rise€to€the€allegations€that€are€the€subject€of€the€criminal€chargesÐ ù”  Ðagainst€him.Ð Å` Ðà  àThe€defendant€in€this€case€does€not€argue€that€the€Indictment€is€too€vague€toÐ ‘, Ðsustain€a€charge.€He€does€argue€that€with€an€indictment€that€lacks€this€degree€ofÐ ]ø Ðspecificity€he€needs€additional€information€to€formulate€a€defense€and€to€be€afforded€hisÐ )Ä Ðfull€array€of€constitutional€rights.Ð õ Ðà  àAgain,€if€more€specific€information€is€not€provided,€as€to€exactly€whichÐ Á\ Ðagreement,€which€persons,€what€date(s)€or€what€time(s)€the€Indictment€discussesÐ ( Ðrelative€to€his€criminal€conduct,€the€defendant€would€have€no€way€to€assert€a€doubleÐ Yô Ðjeopardy€claim.€Ð %!À  Ðà  àA€subsequent€prosecution€could€be€started€with€òòexactly€the€same€language€asÐ ñ"Œ" Ðthis€Indictmentóó,€allegedly€referring€to€a€different€agreement€between€this€defendant€theÐ ½$X $ Ðsame€persons€or€other€persons€and€the€defendant€would€have€no€way€of€differentiatingÐ ‰&$"& Ðfor€the€Court,€that€the€new€prosecution€is€the€same,€or€for€that€matter€is€different,€fromÐ U(ð#( Ðthe€instant€one.€This€would€defeat€his€constitutional€right€to€contest€the€prosecution€onÐ !*¼%* Ðthe€grounds€of€double€jeopardy.Ð í+ˆ', ÐÐ ¹-T). ÐÓ  Óò òCONCLUSIONó óÐ e ÐÓáFÓà  àIn€order€to€preserve€the€defendantððs€constitutional€rights,€as€outlined€in€the€Fifth,Ð =Ø ÐSixth€and€Fourteenth€Amendments€to€the€United€States€Constitution€and€the€pertinentÐ  ¤ Ðcase€law,€as€well€as,€on€the€basis€of€fundamental€fairness,€the€Court€should€require€theÐ Õ p Ðgovernment€to€produce€a€Bill€of€Particulars€specifying€the€place(s),€time(s)€and€partiesÐ ¡ < Ðinvolved€in€the€agreement€that€this€Indictment€alleges€against€the€defendant.Ô#†XôøXX X!¼?#ÔÔ‡ X!XXXôøÔÐ m   ÐÌÓ  Óò òADDENDUMó óÐ    ÐÌÓ  ÓA€copy€of€the€Indictment€in€this€case€is€included€for€the€Courtððs€convenience.Ð ©D ÐÌÌÓÓà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àòòÔ#†XôøXà X!MI#ÔÔ‡ X!XàXôøÔJoseph€C.€Laws,€Jr.óóÐ  ¨ Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àFederal€Public€DefenderÐ óŽ ÐÌÓfæÓà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àòòÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àóóÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àAssistant€Federal€Public€DefenderÐ [ö Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àÔ_ÔUSDPRÔ_Ô„Ð )Ä Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à259€F.D.€RooseveltÐ ÷’ Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àSan€Juan,€PR€€00918„2305Ð Å `  Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àTel.€€281„4922Ô#†XôøXX X!²J#ÔÔ‡ X!XXXôøÔÐ “!.! ÐÓfæ}KÓà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àÔ#†XôøXX X!ÙN#ÔÔ‡ X!XXXôøÔÌà  àÔ#†XôøXX X!¦O#Ô